Dec 23, 20226 min read

Emerging Data Destroys the Narrative on Mandating Vaccines

The data is everywhere! In recent months we are starting to see more information and data emerge about the vaccine. We are seeing data regarding the serious adverse events, the negative efficacy of the vaccine, all-cause mortality in the vaccinated, and the safety of early treatment using re-purposed drugs.

This information is beginning to destroy the narrative that the vaccines are safe and effective and the only way forward in this pandemic. We are finally beginning to see countries fight back and hold people accountable for what could only be described as mass murder on a global scale.

A new report from the UK completely destroys the narrative regarding the push for vaccines. The data shows that over two-thirds of the deaths from the Delta variant are from the vaccinated. From February 1 to August 2, 2021, out of 742 deaths, 402 people were fully vaccinated, 79 people had received at least one dose and 253 people were unvaccinated.

While the data shows that a higher number of unvaccinated people are getting ill compared to their vaccinated counterparts, it also shows us that the unvaccinated have a greater chance of surviving than those who have been vaccinated. Out of 151,054 cases reported in unvaccinated individuals resulting in 253 deaths, we see that there is a 0.17% chance of dying if you are unvaccinated. Compare this to 117,115 cases reported for vaccinated individuals having one or more doses of the vaccine and 481 resulting deaths shows us that those who have received the vaccine have a 0.41% chance of dying. That is a 2.5 times higher death rate for the vaccinated than the unvaccinated.

Regardless of this data. We see uncanny attempts to push the vaccine to everybody in the world. On 23 September 2021, Paul Joseph Watson of Summit News published this article, "CEO of Moderna Says Even Young Will Need to Take Vaccine Booster Shots Indefinitely". This man has a vested interest in making sure Moderna sells as many jabs as possible. I don't think he has the best interest of the people in mind or he's incompetent if he is unaware of this common data. Either way, this is unacceptable and won't be tolerated as more people begin to wake up.

The rate of serious adverse events that are elevated due to the COVID vaccines is extremely high as well. In an article written by Jessica Rose and Mathew Crawford titled "Estimating the number of COVID vaccine deaths in America," they compile the information received from the VAERS database on serious adverse events into a table showing the elevation rate from the COVID vaccine compared to 5 years worth of information from all other vaccines. Nearly all of the adverse events they looked at were highly elevated compared to the normal baseline event rate. Out of 41 different adverse reactions with elevated incidence, the top 10 adverse events on the list were:

Pulmonary embolism - with an incidence rate of 473 X over normal
Stroke - with an incidence rate of 326 X over normal
Deep vein thrombosis - with an incidence rate of 264.3 X over normal
Thrombosis - with an incidence rate of 250.5 X over normal
Fibrin D dimer (Blood clots) - with an incidence rate of 220.8 X over normal
Appendicitis - with an incidence rate of 145.5 X over normal
Tinnitus - with an incidence rate of 97.3 X over normal
Cardiac arrest - with an incidence rate of 75 X over normal
Death - with an incidence rate of 58.1 X over normal
Parkinson's disease - with an incidence rate of 55 X over normal

This information can be used to determine whether the vaccine was involved with the death of an individual. If an increased number of people are dying from pulmonary embolisms, and the adverse reaction incidence for pulmonary embolisms is highly elevated from the vaccine, one could hypothesize that there is a direct correlation between the vaccine and death resulting from pulmonary embolism in a vaccinated individual. The question arises as to why the CDC and the FDA are not talking about this data or using it to make their decisions with regards to the vaccine.

Trump once said that "We can't have the cure be worse than the problem", but it seems as if that is exactly the situation we find ourselves in with this vaccine. A response to an FOI request for hospitalizations in Musgrove Park Hospital in the UK shows a correlation between the vaccine and an increased risk of death from any cause. From January 1 to June 30, 2021, The hospital records 34,233 admissions, of those, 17,225 people were vaccinated with 344 deaths recorded, and 14,008 were unvaccinated with 261 recorded deaths. The NHS Somerset who responded to the request had this to say on their website.

We are aware of a social media post that includes a screenshot of a recent Freedom of Information request we have responded to. Our response provides details of the number of deaths (from all causes) for patients who have been i) vaccinated; ii) not vaccinated. This information does not show the number of vaccinated patients who died of COVID-19. The majority of patient deaths at our hospital (even during 2020) were from causes other than COVID-19.

There may be no way to verify that the deaths of those who were vaccinated were due to an adverse reaction to the vaccine. However, the fact that larger groups of vaccinated people are being admitted to the hospital and dying while at the hospital compared to the number of unvaccinated people, is certainly suspicious.

A research paper titled "The SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant is poised to acquire complete resistance to wild-type spike vaccines" details how the vaccines may very shortly become completely useless against protecting the vaccinated against the virus. It also explains how the vaccine could enhance the ability to infect people with future variants.

This paper along with Pfizer's clinical trial study indicates that the virus is mutating and that future variants are evading the vaccine. Pfizer's study also found an average vaccine efficacy decline of 6% every 2 months. Seven days after administering the vaccine, the efficacy rate peaked at 96.2%, yet after only 4 months the efficacy had dropped to 83.7%. With an efficacy decline rate of 3%/month, regular boosters would be needed every few months to maintain any kind of efficacy. This seems absurd when you look at the protection that natural immunity offers and how natural immunity is capable of adapting to virus mutations.

Despite what the fake news media, crooked politicians, and corrupt scientists who are in bed with big pharma may tell you, there is more than one solution to curing COVID other than the vaccine. Following early treatment protocols is critically important to avoiding hospitalization. This article details different protocol methods and covers vaccine side effects. Re-purposing medication intended for a different illness is one way that we can combat this virus. Doctors have been doing this for many years and should be allowed to prescribe the medication they feel is the best course of treatment for their patients.

There are medications that have been approved for use that doctor's all over the world have discovered work well for illnesses other than what they were designed to treat. This is not a new concept in the area of medication. For example, certain anti-depressants have been found to help prevent migraines, and medication used to treat type 2 diabetes has been shown to help women with fertility problems become pregnant. In the past, doctors could use their own discretion to prescribe medications to their patients for something other than their intended use.

However, with the politicization of this virus, certain medications that have been found to be effective in the treatment of COVID are being suppressed. Doctors are being threatened with losing their medical licenses and their careers over effective treatments, in a push to get the entire globe vaccinated.

There is hope however that people are finally seeing the truth of what's really happening. Recently in India, The Indian Bar Association is now suing the WHO's chief scientist, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, for running a disinformation campaign against Ivermectin as a treatment for Covid-19, resulting in the mass murder of Indians. The Indian Bar Association has referenced peer-reviewed studies and evidence compiled by the FLCCC group and the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) panel in their suit against Swaminathan. They have accused her of misconduct for using her position to further the agenda of special interest groups and to maintain the EUA and help big pharma make billions in vaccine profits.

The penalty for Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and others for the murder of each person who died as a result of this crime would be death or life imprisonment as outlined in section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. We can only hope that this is the beginning of accountability for the people who have perpetrated these crimes against humanity.

Millions of people have died due to the bio-weapon that was released on us, the suppression of life-saving medication capable of curing it, and the forced vaccination of a global population that will likely kill millions more, if not directly, then certainly indirectly through adverse reactions. Early treatment is key to fighting this virus and developing a natural immunity that will far outlast the Antibody-Dependent Enhancement found in a vaccine whose efficacy decreases monthly and will require continual booster shots.

Sources Cited:

Emerging Data Destroys the Narrative on Mandating Vaccines

Recent Posts

Comments